The paper (joint with Peter Diamond) is forthcoming in AEJ: Economic Policy
Abstract: With heterogeneity in both skills and discount factors, the Atkinson-Stiglitz theorem that savings should not be taxed does not hold. In a model with heterogeneity of preferences at each earnings level, introducing a savings tax on high earners or a savings subsidy on low earners increases welfare, regardless of the correlation between ability and discount factor. Extending Saez (2002), a uniform savings tax increases welfare if that correlation is sufficiently high. Key for the results is that types who value future consumption less are more tempted by a lower paid job. Some optimal tax results and empirical evidence are presented.
The paper can be found here
Thursday, 17 February 2011
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
![[photo: EOPP HOME]](http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/images/eopp/blog/eopp_home.jpg)
![[photo: Maitreesh Ghatak]](http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/staffphotos/maitreesh_ghatak_small.gif)